CMU 15-112 Spring 2017: Fundamentals of Programming and Computer Science
Homework 2 (Due Saturday 28-Jan, at 8pm)
- This hw is SOLO. See the syllabus for details.
- To start:
- Create a folder named 'week2'
- Download both hw2.py and cs112_s17_linter.py to that folder
- Edit hw2.py using pyzo
- When you are ready, submit hw2.py to autolab. For this hw, you may submit up to 10 times, but only your last submission counts.
- Do not use strings, lists, or recursion this week.
- Do not hardcode the test cases in your solutions.
Note: while you may not use strings in general on this hw, they are in fact required for those of you who attempt the bonus problem. As such, the linter may not issue warnings on strings anywhere. Even so, do not use strings for any problems except the bonus problem.
- nthKaprekarNumber(n)
Note: please do not start this problem or the next problem prior to Friday's recitation. In Friday's recitation, the TA's will discuss these two problems in detail, and you will have some additional time to solve the problem then. If you start the problem before Friday, it will likely take you much longer, and you'll also likely get much less out of Friday's recitation. So: if you want to get a jump on this hw before Friday, please try problems 4-6.
Background: a Kaprekar number is a non-negative integer, the representation of whose square can be split into two possibly-different-length parts (where the right part is not zero) that add up to the original number again. For instance, 45 is a Kaprekar number, because 45**2 = 2025 and 20+25 = 45. You can read more about Kaprekar numbers here. The first several Kaprekar numbers are: 1, 9, 45, 55, 99, 297, 703, 999 , 2223, 2728,...
With this in mind, write the function nthKaprekarNumber(n) that takes a non-negative int n and returns the nth Kaprekar number, where as usual we start counting at n==0. - integral(f, a, b, N)
Note: as noted above, please do not start this problem or the previous problem prior to Friday's recitation.
Background: in calculus, we use the integral of a function f from x=a to x=b to compute the area under the curve between those points (or the negative area if the function is below the x-axis). One way to approximate this area (that is, to find it without doing any actual calculus!) is by replacing the smooth function with a collection of N trapezoids, as shown in this image (from here, with N=5):
As in that image, here we will only use uniform widths, so each of the trapezoids has a width of (b - a)/N, so that all N of them together span the width of (b - a).
In any case, the larger N is, the more trapezoids you use, the more accurate your approximation becomes. You can read more here about this so-called trapezoidal rule.
With this in mind, write the function integral(f, a, b, N) that takes a Python function f (that itself takes one value x, a float, and returns a float), and two floats a and b, where a<=b, and a positive int N, and uses the trapezoidal rule with N trapezoids to return the approximate area under the curve of f(x) where a <= x <= b. To be clear, in the case where N=1, this uses just one trapezoid, where the left edge is at (a, f(a)) and the right edge is at (b, f(b)), so the result is (b - a) * (f(a) + f(b))/2 (the width times the average height of the trapezoid).
Hint: you should use almostEqual in your test function. Also, you'll probably want to use some very simple curves for testing, such as f(x)=x, f(x)=2*x+3, and f(x)=2*x**2, and then in ranges (a,b) with values of N such that you can fairly easily compute the expected answer by hand.
Another hint: here is a basic example showing how functions work as parameters to other functions:def f1(x): return x+1 def f2(x): return x+2 def h(f): return f(10) print(h(f1)) # calls f1(10), prints 11 print(h(f2)) # calls f2(10), prints 12
- nearestKaprekarNumber(n)
Note: as noted above, please do not start this problem prior to completing nthKaprekarNumber in Friday's recitation. Portions of that solution will prove very helpful here.
Bearing in mind the definition of Kaprekar Number from above, write the function nearestKaprekarNumber(n) that takes an int or float value n and returns the Kaprekar number closest to n, with ties going to smaller value. For example, nearestKaprekarNumber(49) returns 45, and nearestKaprekarNumber(51) returns 55. And since ties go to the smaller number, nearestKaprekarNumber(50) returns 45.
Note: as you probably guessed, this also cannot be solved by counting up from 0, as that will not be efficient enough to get past the autograder. Hint: one way to solve this is to start at n and grow in each direction until you find a Kaprekar number. - carrylessMultiply(x, y)
Write the function carrylessMultiply(x, y), that works similarly to carrylessAdd(x, y) (which we will cover in the lab, and please do not do it prior to then, which means that this problem should not be attempted until after you finish lab2), based on this paper on Carryless Arithmetic. This paper shows that carrylessMultiply(643, 59) returns 417. Hint: it may help if you do this differently than usual long multiplication. Instead of working by rows in the output, work by columns. So first compute all the ones digit values, and sum those mod 10. Then compute all the tens digit values, and sum those mod 10. And so on. You may assume x and y are non-negative.
Hint #1: do not solve carrylessMultiply(x, y) by simply calling carrylessAdd(x, result) a total of y times. That is wrong on two levels. First, it is simply too inefficient (what if we are multiplying 20-digit numbers?). Second, it is also wrong algorithmically! CarrylessMultiply is not like normal multiply, and if we take + to be carrylessAdd and * to be carrylessMultiply, then it is not necessarily true that (x * y) is the same as (x + x + ... + x + x) for a total of y x's. Yikes. So: stick with the next hint (see below). It also uses carrylessAdd and is fairly straightforward, but it is reasonable efficient and algorithmically correct. Good luck with it.
Hint #2: Here's a hint on one way to solve this problem (there are many ways, and this way is not the most efficient, to be sure, but it is efficient enough and it is perhaps among the clearest and easiest ways).
Consider multiplying 123 * 456. Observe that:
123 * 456 = 123 * 4 * 100 + 123 * 5 * 10 + 123 * 6
in this way, we actually only have to multiply 123 times a single digit each time, then multiply that result by the right power of 10. Right?
Ok, so now, to multiply by a single digit, we can instead just add that many times. That is:
123 * 6 == 123 + 123 + 123 + 123 + 123 + 123
Why is that interesting? Because we already have carrylessAdd, so we can just use that to do all this addition.
Of course, multiplying by simply adding is very inefficient. But since we are only doing it for multiplying by a single digit, there's a max of 9 additions (8 if you think about it), and so it's not so inefficient. It's actually acceptable, if not ideal, and certainly good enough for hw2, though again better approaches do exist.
Hope this helps. And, again, you can safely ignore all of this and solve this problem any way you wish. - nthSmithNumber(n)
Write the function nthSmithNumber that takes a non-negative int n and returns the nth Smith number, where a Smith number is a composite (non-prime) the sum of whose digits are the sum of the digits of its prime factors (excluding 1). Note that if a prime number divides the Smith number multiple times, its digit sum is counted that many times. For example, 4 equals 2**2, so the prime factor 2 is counted twice, thus making 4 a Smith Number. - Bonus/Optional: play112 (The 112 Game) [3 pts]
Read the writeup for "The 112 Game" here (skip to Part B). Be sure to follow the spec exactly, so the autograder can properly grade your work! As with all bonus, we recommend that you only do this for the joy of learning (which is great), and not for the points (which are modest).